Judges 14

Judges 14 chronicles the beginning of Samson’s active conflict with the Philistines, sparked not by religious zeal, but by personal desire. Samson insists on marrying a Philistine woman from Timnah, disregarding his parents’ counsel and the Mosaic Law. During the courtship, he kills a lion through the Spirit’s power and later eats honey from its carcass, violating his Nazirite vow. At his wedding feast, he poses a riddle to his Philistine guests based on this secret experience. When the guests threaten his bride, she manipulates Samson into revealing the answer. The chapter ends in violence: Samson kills thirty men in Ashkelon to pay a gambling debt and leaves his wife, who is then given to his best man. The narrative highlights God’s ability to use Samson’s flaws to provoke a necessary confrontation with Israel’s oppressors.

---

1. The Forbidden Desire and Divine Providence (Judges 14:1–4)

1 Samson went down to Timnah, and at Timnah he saw one of the daughters of the Philistines. 2 Then he came up and told his father and mother, “I saw one of the daughters of the Philistines at Timnah. Now get her for me as my wife.” 3 But his father and mother said to him, “Is there not a woman among the daughters of your relatives, or among all our people, that you must go to take a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?” But Samson said to his father, “Get her for me, for she is right in my eyes.” 4 His father and mother did not know that it was from the Lord, for he was seeking an opportunity against the Philistines. At that time the Philistines ruled over Israel.

Commentary:

• “Went Down”: Geographically, Timnah was lower in elevation than Zorah, but theologically, this phrase often signals spiritual decline. Samson is leaving the safety of his community to enter enemy territory.
• “She is Right in My Eyes”: This phrase is thematic for the book of Judges (e.g., Judges 21:25, “Everyone did what was right in his own eyes”). Samson is governed by lust and visual appeal rather than God’s law, which forbade intermarriage with pagan nations (Deut 7:3).
• The Parents’ Protest: Manoah and his wife correctly identify the spiritual danger. They refer to the Philistines as “uncircumcised,” a derogatory term emphasizing their covenant-less status.
• God’s Hidden Hand (v. 4): This is a crucial theological pivot. The text states this was “from the Lord.” This does not mean God condoned Samson’s sin or lust, but that God sovereignly intended to use Samson’s stubbornness as a wedge to break the peaceful coexistence (assimilation) between Israel and Philistia. God sought an “opportunity”—a pretext for war.

2. The Lion, the Spirit, and the Broken Vow (Judges 14:5–9)

5 Then Samson went down with his father and mother to Timnah, and they came to the vineyards of Timnah. And behold, a young lion came toward him roaring. 6 Then the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and although he had nothing in his hand, he tore the lion in pieces as one tears a young goat. But he did not tell his father or his mother what he had done. 7 Then he went down and talked with the woman, and she was right in Samson’s eyes. 8 After some days he returned to take her. And he turned aside to see the carcass of the lion, and behold, there was a swarm of bees in the body of the lion, and honey. 9 He scraped it out into his hands and went on, eating as he went. And he came to his father and mother and gave some to them, and they ate. But he did not tell them that he had scraped the honey from the carcass of the lion.

Commentary:

• The Vineyard: Nazirites were forbidden to eat grapes or drink wine. Samson’s presence in a vineyard suggests he was already flirting with the boundaries of his vow.
• The Rushing Spirit: The “Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him” indicates a sudden, temporary burst of supernatural power. This is charismatic empowerment for a task, not necessarily an endorsement of his character.
• Tearing the Lion: The ease of the victory (“as one tears a young goat”) underscores the magnitude of divine strength.
• Violation of the Vow: Upon returning, Samson interacts with a dead body (the lion carcass), which was strictly forbidden for a Nazirite (Num 6:6).
• Double Deception: He eats the honey (unclean by contact) and gives it to his parents, making them ritually unclean without their knowledge. His silence (“he did not tell them”) proves he knew he had broken his vow.

3. The Wedding Feast and the Riddle (Judges 14:10–14)

10 His father went down to the woman, and Samson prepared a feast there, for so the young men used to do. 11 As soon as the people saw him, they brought thirty companions to be with him. 12 And Samson said to them, “Let me now put a riddle to you. If you can tell me what it is, within the seven days of the feast, and find it out, then I will give you thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothes, 13 but if you cannot tell me what it is, then you shall give me thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothes.” And they said to him, “Put your riddle, that we may hear it.” 14 And he said to them, “Out of the eater came something to eat. Out of the strong came something sweet.” And in three days they could not solve the riddle.

Commentary:

• The Feast (Mishteh): The Hebrew word implies a drinking party. It is highly probable Samson drank wine here, marking another potential violation of his Nazirite vow.
• The Thirty Companions: These were likely Philistine guards or “groomsmen” assigned to watch Samson, as the Philistines likely viewed him with suspicion due to his strength.
• The Riddle: Riddles were a common form of entertainment and intellectual combat in the Ancient Near East.
• The Unfairness: The riddle was unsolvable because it was based on a private, secret experience (the lion and honey) rather than common knowledge.
• High Stakes: Thirty linen garments and changes of clothes represented a significant amount of wealth—essentially a year’s wages for a laborer.

4. Betrayal and the Solution (Judges 14:15–18)

15 On the fourth day they said to Samson’s wife, “Entice your husband to tell us what the riddle is, lest we burn you and your father’s house with fire. Have you invited us here to impoverish us?” 16 And Samson’s wife wept over him and said, “You only hate me; you do not love me. You have put a riddle to my people, and you have not told me what it is.” And he said to her, “Behold, I have not told my father nor my mother, and shall I tell you?” 17 She wept before him the seven days that their feast lasted, and on the seventh day he told her, because she pressed him hard. Then she told the riddle to her people. 18 And the men of the city said to him on the seventh day before the sun went down, “What is sweeter than honey? What is stronger than a lion?” And he said to them, “If you had not plowed with my heifer, you would not have found out my riddle.”

Commentary:

• Philistine Brutality: The threat to burn the bride and her father shows the cruel nature of the Philistines. (Ironically, they eventually do exactly this in Judges 15:6).
• Weaponized Tears: Samson could defeat a lion, but he could not withstand the emotional manipulation of a weeping woman. This foreshadows his ultimate downfall with Delilah.
• Priorities: Samson argues that he hasn’t even told his parents (his closest loyalty), so why should he tell her? This indicates the marriage bond was not yet fully cemented in trust.
• “Plowed with my heifer”: This is a crude, rustic metaphor. It implies they used his property (his wife) to do their work. It insults both the men (calling them cheaters) and the wife (comparing her to a cow/livestock).

5. The Violent Response (Judges 14:19–20)

19 And the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon and struck down thirty men of the town and took their spoil and gave the garments to those who had told the riddle. In hot anger he went back to his father’s house. 20 And Samson’s wife was given to his companion, who had been his best man.

Commentary:

• Ashkelon: Samson travels about 25 miles to Ashkelon, a major Philistine coastal city, to find victims.
• Justified Anger? While Samson is motivated by personal rage and a gambling debt, the Spirit uses this to execute judgment on the Philistines. The text does not condone the murder of these specific 30 men as a moral good, but presents it as an act of war in a brutal time.
• “Hot Anger”: Samson leaves the wedding feast without consummating the marriage (or taking his wife home), returning to his parents’ house in a rage.
• The Final Insult: The chapter ends tragically. The father-in-law, assuming Samson has abandoned the girl, gives her to the “best man” to save face. This sets the stage for the escalation of violence in the next chapter.

---

Theological Significance

• Providence over Personality: The primary theological takeaway is that God is not limited by the flaws of His instruments. Samson is impulsive, lustful, and ceremonially unclean, yet God effectively uses him to disrupt the Philistine occupation.
• The Nature of the Spirit’s Power: In the Old Testament, the Spirit came upon individuals for specific tasks (governance, war, prophecy). It is distinct from the New Testament indwelling that produces the “Fruit of the Spirit” (character). Samson had the power of the Spirit without the character of a saint.
• Separation: The narrative reinforces the danger of assimilation. When God’s people (Samson) try to blend in with the world (Philistines), it leads to compromise, heartbreak, and inevitable conflict.

Practical Applications

• Dating and Marriage: Samson’s criterion for marriage (“she is right in my eyes”) is a warning against choosing a partner based solely on physical attraction or personal desire, ignoring shared faith and values.
• Emotional Manipulation: The chapter illustrates the destructive power of manipulation in relationships. True love is based on trust, not coercion.
• Little Compromises: Samson didn’t wake up one day and lose his strength. It started here—walking in vineyards, touching dead lions, and partying with the enemy. Small compromises lead to major downfalls.
• God’s Sovereignty in Messy Lives: Even when we make poor choices (like Samson), God is powerful enough to weave those threads into His larger plan—though we may still suffer the natural consequences of those choices.

Final Insight

Samson fights the right enemy (Philistines) for the wrong reasons (personal vendettas). He is a picture of potential wasted by lack of discipline, yet he remains a testament to God’s commitment to save His people despite their unworthiness.